In Lesson 20 we saw that the problem was GIGO. Now we look at the solution. In the next three lessons we will see three practise items on the GBB. The first one will be: Free Fridays on Public Transport. These will be full 10-point GBBs and therefore assisted by AI. Human binary thinkers usually can do around 3-5 points.
Lesson 23 Daily Feedback Question:
Do a GBB about how you currently feel about AI.
• Post below a GOOD point you like about AI.
• Post below a BAD point you don’t like about.
• Post below a BETTER point you think could be better about AI.
Next Lesson: GBB Practise #1
Good: Automates tasks and improves efficiency and productivity-templates can be used, high quality output and time saved on demanding tasks
Bad: May impair the ability of humans to analyse and think deeply.
Better: Automation and efficiency, with the right quality inputs could equip humans with higher skills and the ability to solve problems multidimensionally, utilising the scarcest of resources-time- in a much better manner.
Good: AI amplifies my reach significantly. Bad: it can make shallow thinking feel complete. Better: treated as a thinking partner rather than an answer machine, it changes everything about the interaction.
I feel excited and nervous about Chat GPT in equal measure, I’m not as frightened of it as I was.
A GOOD point is clearly it’s capacity to provide 360 degree analysis, which in turn will teach me more of the same.
A BAD point is the enormous leverage it provides to nefarious organisations, be it petty crime or large scale government activity.
A BETTER point is may end up doing hugely wonderful things like helping solve poverty or similar global issues.
Good: Innovative Opportunities: Working with AI opens doors to innovative solutions and novel approaches in various domains.
Bad: Job Displacement Worries: The fear of job displacement due to automation and AI advancements is a common concern.
Better: Human-AI Collaboration: Emphasize the collaborative potential of AI, highlighting its role as a tool to augment human capabilities rather than replace them.
Bad: hard to feed specifics without my bias.
Good: brings out points I hadn’t considered
Better: Seems to combine risk assessment with a work around for a better outcome derived from the good and bad lists
Good:
AI/ChatGPT can give me information that may not of thought of before.
Bad:
AI/ChatGPT may have hidden bias.
Better:
AI/ChatGPT could evolve to allow diagnostics on non-text data.
that was amazing
Good: It’s like an advanced form of rubber-ducky debugging, where you talk to an object and explain a concept to better help your own understanding of it. In this case the rubber ducky can talk back and add new information and rephrase things.
Bad: It’s not always accurate and it feels to be hit and miss in what it remembers and what it doesn’t in each session.
Better: To get the best result you really need to feed it the whole prompt in one go while being very specific. Using templates would help.