Lesson 21 DFQ: Rewrite below the most interesting sentence that you will think more about, from reading this lesson.
Next Lesson: Thinking Skills and AI
Lesson 21 TBD: Garbage Prompts
Lesson 21 DFQ: Rewrite below the most interesting sentence that you will think more about, from reading this lesson.
Next Lesson: Thinking Skills and AI
Writing Good ChatGPT Prompts is going to be must have future skill. Writing good prompts is important however, capacity to review the answer is even more critical.
In responding to what is interesting about this content, the word “quality” jumped out at me as well as interpreting and applying the information., For me, “fit for purpose” would mean my ChatGPT question needs to be relevant to what I am trying to achieve, what I take from the response and how I am going to apply that knowledge. Different approach to what I thought I might apply when crafting my question.
The key is for users to be aware of their thinking limitations and to take time to carefully consider the responses provided by ChatGBT, to critically evaluate the information provided, and to seek additional sources of information and advice if needed.
While superior thinking skills may help a user in formulating the questions, understanding the content and nuances of the answers, and making an informed decisions based on the information provided by ChatGPT, weak thinking skills may lead to less effective use of the tool.
It is necessary to continually create strategies to critically evaluate the answer and the question to reduce the possibility of the result proceeding in the wrong direction.
However, ChatGBT can still be a useful tool for users with weaker thinking skills as it can provide them with access to information and knowledge that they may not have had access to otherwise.
If superior thinking can extend the superiority of the communicator with Generative AI, is it possible that the weaker will extend his or hers weaknesses? Will the smart become smarter, and the stupid will become stupider. Or may be that both will upgrade their thinking and therefore their resalts but the gap will extend itself. For example 10% more for 150 IQ is 15 more points as for one with 80 IQ it is only 8 more. the Gap is growing. They say that if you are rich you can become richer more likely than the poor, although there are some cases when David beat Goliath.
However, ChatGPT can still be a useful tool for users with weaker thinking skills as it can provide them with access to information and knowledge that they may not have had access to otherwise.
The quality of the answers received from ChatGPT depends on the quality of
the questions asked and the knowledge and expertise of the user in
interpreting and applying the responses received.
I’m convinced there is real value in being a domain expert and using ChatGPT. You can ask better questions and create better prompts with your domain knowledge and will understand when the AI is hallucinating and you are able to take the ideas from ChatGPT and make cognitive leaps (dare I say x10 them!)
The key is for users to be aware of their thinking limitations and to take time to carefully consider the responses provided by ChatGBT, to critically evaluate the information provided, and to seek additional sources of information and advice if needed.
I am aware that I have thinking limitations. I carefully consider the responses I elicit from ChatGPT, critically evaluating both my inputs and the AI’s output. I then triangulate this information with other trusted sources and viewpoints for a comprehensive understanding.