Rate Your Cognitive Engagement

X10 THINKING is for success in life and growth in business by raising your own daily level of cognitive engagement.

Raising engagement in each business quarter is a new strengths-based strategy for a much better return on payroll.

Employees are engaged by their employers. Why? Because employers hire employees to pay attention to minding the shareholders’ business.

Salespeople are engaged by their B2B customers. Why? Because customers choose salespeople who can pay professional attention to meeting their expectations.

Engagement is all about attention and you can use the 20 questions below to rate your own cognitive engagement, your own ability to pay attention.

On the job, some employees pay more attention than others. In selling, some salespeople pay more attention than others. Why is that?

According to GALLUP there are three types of employees: Engaged, Disengaged and Actively Disengaged.

Attention is all about cognitive engagement. Here’s a simple audit for you to rate your own cognitive engagement in just 20 questions. It was designed by Dr Eric Bienstock who is Vice-Principal of SOT in New York. Eric holds a Master’s degree in Mathematics from the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, and a Ph.D. from New York University where he studied Mathematics, Education and Learning Theory. He based this checklist on the SOT’s Learn-To-Think Coursebook and Instructors Manual (Michael Hewitt-Gleeson & Edward de Bono, Capra/New 1982).

default

How well do you pay attention? Use these 20 questions to rate your own level of cognitive engagement … 

INSTRUCTIONS: Answer each of the following 20 questions, scoring
either 3, 2, 1, or 0 points for each answer depending on your
objective estimate of how often you actually do what is stated.
Use your best guess of the following criteria for scoring:

3 – 90% OF THE TIME (nearly always)
2 – 70% OF THE TIME (mostly)
1 – 40% OF THE TIME (often)
0 – 10% OF THE TIME (hardly ever)

SCORE

______ My judgments of ideas are based on the value of the idea rather
than on my emotions at the time.

_______ I judge ideas not just as “good” or “bad” but also as “interesting”
if they can lead on to better ideas.

_______ I consider all factors in a situation before choosing, deciding or planning.

_______ I consider all factors first, before picking out the ones that matter most.

_______ When I create a rule I see to it that it is clearly understood
and possible to obey.

_______ I try to see the purpose of rules I have to obey, even if I don’t like the rules.

_______ I look at consequences of my decisions or actions not only as they affect me
but also as they affect other people.

_______ I look at a wide range of possible consequences before deciding
which consequences to bother about.

_______ On the way to a final objective I establish a chain of smaller objectives
each one following on from the previous one.

_______ The objectives I set are near enough, real enough and possible
enough for me to really try to reach them.

_______ In planning, I know exactly what I want to achieve.

_______ I keep my plans as simple and direct as possible.

_______ I know exactly why I have chosen something as a priority.

_______ I try to get as many different ideas as possible first,
before starting to pick out the priorities.

_______ I will go on looking for alternatives until I find one I really like.

_______ While most people look for alternatives when they are not satisfied;
I look for them deliberately even when I am satisfied.

_______ I am able to tell myself the real reason behind a decision I make.

_______ Before making a decision, I consider the factors, look at the consequences,
get clear about the objectives, assess the priorities, and search for possible alternatives.

_______ I am able to see the other person’s point-of-view whether I agree with it or not.

_______ I am able to spell out the differences and similarities between different viewpoints.

_______ TOTAL SCORE.

default

INTERPRETATION

Don’t panic, this is NOT a scientific test. It’s an audit or checklist to help you take stock of your thinking, your own attention skills, your own cognitive engagement. That’s all!

Every day the output of your brain is decisions. You make hundreds of conscious decisions a day, sometimes more. The quality of these decisions has a direct impact on the quality of your personal life, your family, your business and your friends. If you can raise the quality of your decisions you can raise the quality of your life.

A trained thinker can direct his or her thinking and use it in a deliberate manner to produce an effect. To a trained and skilled thinker, thinking is a tool that can be used at will and the use of this tool is practical. This ability to use ‘thinking as a skill’ is the sort of thinking ability that is required to get things DONE.

• If your total score in this test was between 51 and 60 points, you may already possess superior brainpower.

• If you scored between 31 and 50 points, you may have better than average brainpower.

• If you scored between 0 and 30, you may possess no additional brainpower other than the natural thinking ability that most people have.

___________ Record your score and post any comments you have:

Family, Friends and Colleagues
If you wish to pass it on to others you can print it out or forward this email to anyone whom you think will benefit from it, too.

———-

DFQ #042:

What was your score? _________

In thinking about your brainpower audit what interesting comments can you make?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

955 thoughts on “Rate Your Cognitive Engagement

  1. Score of 42.
    Wasn’t too surprised. There are certain occasions when I find myself reacting emotionally. The key is/has always been to be able to tell when this is the case. This is why I have always found it useful to have someone to bounce ideas/decisions with.

  2. Score was 35.
    I see a lot of room to be more conscious about the choices I make. I need to foster the ability to step back and be the man on the hill – taking in the view in its entirety before returning with a point of view.
    And, I musn’t be afraid or ashamed to climb the hill over and over – even for one single decision.

  3. 30 There is a lot more I can do before I arrive at a decision. Although best intentioned, I am probably letting myself and others down at the moment as I have never really paid active attention to my decision making skill, rather just made a decision.

  4. I believe I assessed myself fairly critically, with the believe that my CVS can be improved further and therefor would not be doing anything at level 3 (90%). Through this I rated myself as a 35, so midway, but room to improve.
    Its interesting to reflect on some of the situations and realise occasions where you may be on autopilot, going through the motions based on habit alone.

  5. Score 42:
    The exercise has illustrated my need to explore a wider range of alternative solutions to problems I’m working through. Adding the “interesting” category to idea processing a good starting point to this decision making process change.